Application of the Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System (QUAIDS) Model in the Demand of the Household Animal Sourced Food in West Java

Bayu KharismaArmida S. AlisjahbanaSutyastie Soemitro RemiPutri Praditya

DOI 10.7160/aol.2020.120103
No 1/2020, March
pp. 23-35

Kharisma, B., Alisjahbana, A. S., Remi, S. S. and Praditya, P. (2020) “Application of the Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System (QUAIDS) Model in the Demand of the Household Animal Sourced Food in West Java", AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 23-35. ISSN 1804-1930. DOI 10.7160/aol.2020.120103.

Abstract

This paper aims to determine the effect of demographic and socio-economic factors and household responses to household changes in prices and income against the demand for household animal-sourced food in West Java Province. The study used cross-section data sourced from the National Socio-Economic Survey (SUSENAS) of West Java Province in 2017 analyzed through the Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System (QUAIDS). The results showed that the demand for household animal-sourced food in West Java was influenced by price, income, and social demographic factors. All groups of animal-sourced food were categorized as normal goods, as characterized by an income elasticity value of more than zero. The income elasticity established meat commodities as the highest with eggs being the lowest. The nature of the commodity determined that all animal-sourced food groups except eggs are luxury goods. Luxury goods are categorized as such due to their above one value of the demand response against changes in income- which in this paper refers to the commodities of fish, meat, poultry, and milk. The own-price elasticity also showed meat as the most responsive commodity to price increases compared to fish, poultry milk, and eggs. The five groups of commodities achieved a negative elasticity value, as reflected by the reduced share when the decreasing demand responds to the commodity price increase. The cross-price elasticity of most animal-sourced food commodity groups achieved negative elasticity values, which indicated that the related animal-sourced food commodity groups were complementary, whereas positive elasticity values indicate the related food commodities group as a substitute.

Keywords

West Java province, QUAIDS, animal sourced food, elasticity.

References

  1. Abdulai, A. (2002) "Household Demand for Food in Switzerland. A Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System", Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Vol. 138, No. 1, pp. 1-18. ISSN 2235-6282.
  2. Aepli, M. (2014) “Analysis of Final Demand for Food and Beverages in Switzerland”, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, ETH Zurich Switzerland. DOI 10.3929/ethz-a-010251132.
  3. Alimi, S. R. (2013) “Households Expenditure Pattern on Beef and Chicken of Selected Households in Akoko South-West LGA of Ondo State, MPRA Paper No. 52153.
  4. Ariningsih, E. (2004) “Study of Animal Protein Consumption in The Time of Economic Crisis in Java”, ICASERD Working Paper No. 28. [Online]. Available: https://pse.litbang.pertanian.go.id/ind/pdffiles/WP_28_2004.pdf [Accessed: 1 Jan. 2019].
  5. Bopape, L. and Myers, R. (2007) “Analysis of Household Demand for Food in South Africa: Model Selection, Expenditure Endogeneity, and the Influence of Socio-Demographic Effects”, African Econometrics Society Annual Conference, Cape Town, South Africa.
  6. BPS (2017) “Pengeluaran Untuk Konsumsi Penduduk Indonesia Per Provinsi” (In Indonesia), Maret 2017, Publikasi BPS. Jakarta.
  7. Burger, R. P., Coetzee, L. Ch., Kreuser, C. F. and Rankin, N. A. (2017) “Income and Price Elasticities of Demand in South Africa: An Application of The Linear Expenditure System”, South African Journal of Economics, Vol. 85, N. 4, pp. 491-514. ISSN 1813-6982. DOI 10.1111/saje.12167.
  8. Deaton, A. and Paxson, C. (1998) "Economies of Scale, Household Size, and The Demand for Food", Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 106, No. 5, pp. 897-930. ISSN 00223808. DOI 10.1086/250035.
  9. DKPP West Java Province (2018) “Pola Pangan Harapan Provinsi Jawa Barat Tahun 2018” (In Indonesia), Bandung. [Online]. Available: http://dkpp.jabarprov.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/POLA-PANGAN-HARAPAN-PROVINSI-JAWA-BARAT-TAHUN-2018.pdf. [Accessed: 20 March,, 2019].
  10. Fabiosa, J. F. (2005) “Growing Demand for Animal-Protein-Source Products in Indonesia: Trade Implications”. CARD Report and Working Papers. 419. Iowa State University.
  11. Faharuddin, Mulyana, A., Yamin, M. and dan Yunita (2015) “Analisis Pola Konsumsi Pangan di Sumatera Selatan 2013: Pendekatan Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System” (In Indonesia), Jurnal Agro Ekonomi, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 123-140. E-ISSN 2541-1527, ISSN 0216-9053. DOI 10.21082/jae.v33n2.2015.121-140.
  12. Hayat, N., Hussain, A. and Yousaf, H. (2016) “Food Demand in Pakistan: Analysis and Projections”, South Asia Economic Journal, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 94-113. ISSN 1391-5614. DOI 10.1177/1391561415621826.
  13. Hoang, L. V. and Glewwe, P. (2011) "Impacts of Rising Food Prices on Poverty and Welfare in Vietnam", Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 14-27. ISSN 10685502.
  14. IFPRI (2016) “Global Hunger Index: Getting to Zero Hunger”, Washington, DC (US): International Food Policy Research Institute. ISBN 9780896292260. DOI 10.2499/9780896292260.
  15. Majumder, A, Ray, R. and Kompal, S. (2012) “Calculating Rural-Urban Food Price Differentials from Unit Values in Household Expenditure Surveys: A Comparison with Existing Methods and A New Procedure”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 94, No. 5, pp. 1218-1235. ISSN 0002-9092. DOI 10.1093/ajae/aas064.
  16. Mayasari, D., Satria, D. and Noor, I. (2018) “Analisis Pola Konsumsi Pangan Berdasarkan Status IPM di Jawa Timur” (In Indonesia), Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 191-213. ISSN 10685502. DOI 10.21002/jepi.v18i2.801.
  17. Ministry of Health (2015) “Nutritional Status Affects Nation Quality”, [Online]. Available: http://www.depkes.go.id/article/print/15021300004/status-gizi-pengaruhi-kualitas-bangsa.html.[Accessed: 10 Feb., 2019].
  18. Mittal, S. (2010) “Application of The Quaids Model to The Food Sector in India”, Journal of Quantitative Economics, Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 42-54. ISSN 0971-1554.
  19. Molina, J. E. and Gil, A. I. (2005) "The Demand Behavior of Consumers in Peru: A Demographic Analysis Using the QUAIDS", Journal of Developing Areas, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 191-206. ISSN 0022037X. DOI 10.1353/jda.2005.0038.
  20. Nugroho, S. and Suparyono, S. W. (2015) “Pola Permintaan Daging Tingkat Rumah Tangga di Indonesia: Analisa Data Mikro 2013” (In Indonesia), Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia, Vol. 16 No. 1, Juli 2015: 47-58. ISSN 10685502. DOI 10.21002/jepi.v16i1.668.
  21. Pakpahan, A. (2018) “Pergeseran Dalam Indeks Kelaparan Global (Global Hunger Index) 2000-2017: Implikasi Terhadap Kebijakan Pertanian, Pangan, dan Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia Indonesia” (In Indonesia), Jurnal Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, Vol. 35, No. 2. ISSN 0216-4361. DOI 10.21082/fae.v35n2.2017.75-90.
  22. Pangaribowo, E. H. and Tsegai, D. W. (2011) “Food Demand Analysis of Indonesian Households with Particular Attention to the Poorest”, Discussion Papers 116748, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF). ISSN 1436-9931.
  23. Poi, B. P (2012) “Easy Demand-System Estimation with Quaids”, The Stata Journal, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 433-446. E-ISSN: 1536-8734, ISSN 1536-867X. DOI 10.1177/1536867X1201200306.
  24. Ravallion, M. and Van de Walle, D. (1991) “The Impact on Poverty of Food Pricing Reforms: A Welfare Analysis for Indonesia”, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 281-299. ISSN 0161-8938. DOI 10.1016/0161-8938(91)90015-Q.
  25. Ray, R. (1983) “Measuring the Costs of Children: An Alternative Approach”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 89-102. ISSN 0047-2727. DOI 10.1016/0047-2727(83)90058-0.
  26. West Java Provincial Government (2015) “Consumption Position of Chicken Meat and Eggs in West Java 10 Kg/capita”. [Online]. Available: http://www.jabarprov.go.id/index.php/news/11686/2015/03/30/Posisi-Konsumsi-Daging-Ayam-dan-Telur-Di-Jabar-10-Kgkapita. [Accessed: 15 Feb. 2019].
  27. Widarjono, A. and Rucbha, S. M. (2016) “Household Food Demand in Indonesia: A Two-Stage Budgeting Approach”, Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 163-177. ISSN 2338-5847. DOI 10.22146/jieb.15287.
  28. Zheng, Z. and Henneberry, S. R. (2010) “The Impact of Changes in Income Distribution on Current and Future Food Demand in Urban China”, Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 1-21. ISSN 10685502.

Full paper

  Full paper (.pdf, 603.2 KB).