Metadata Formats for Data Sharing in Science Support Systems

DOI 10.7160/aol.2017.090306
No 3/2017, September
pp. 61-69

Stočes, M., Šimek, P. and Pavlík, J. (2017) “Metadata Formats for Data Sharing in Science SupportSystems", AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 61 - 69. ISSN 1804-1930. DOI 10.7160/aol.2017.090306.


The article deals with analysis of model data formats suitable for metadata description of digital objects (artifacts) occurring in scientific social network applications. The emphasis of analyzes is on the issue of a metadata description of artefact links to other artifacts and artifact links to individuals. The examined metadata formats include LOM (Learning Objects Metadata), MODS (Metadata Object Description Schema) and DC (Dublin Core). The article also deals with dictionaries of controlled descriptors used to refine and unify the metadata description for agricultural research.The article presents part of the results of author ’s dissertation thesis.


Metadata, application profile, social network service for scientists, data sharing, LOM, MODS, DC, AGROVOC.


  1. Abrahamse, B. (2013) “Getting Started with Marc Edit“, New England Library Association Fall2013, Oct 2013. [Online]. Available: [Accessed: 19 Jun. 2017].
  2. ANSI/NISO Z39.85-2007 (2017) “Dublin Core Metadata Element Set”. ISSN 1041-5635.
  3. Bartošek, M. (1999) “Vyhledávání v Internetu a DUBLIN CORE“ (In Czech), Zpravodaj ÚVT MU,Vol 9. IX, No. 4, pp. 1-4. ISSN 1212-0901.
  4. Beneventano, D., Bergamaschi, S. and Martoglia, R. (2016) "Exploiting semantics for searchingagricultural bibliographic data", Journal of Information Science, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 748-762.ISSN 0165-5515. DOI 10.1177/0165551515606579.
  5. Brand, A., Daly, F. and Meyers, B. (2003) ”Metadata demystified”, Bethesda NISO Press.ISBN 1-880124-59-9.
  6. Bratkova, E. and Mach, J. (2008) “Metadatový soubor pro elektronické vysokoškolskékvalifikační práce v ČR” (in Czech), Asociace knihoven vysokých škol ČR. [Online]. Available: [Accessed: 10 Jun. 2017].
  7. Bretherton, P. F. and Singley, P. T. (1994) “Metadata: a user's view.” In Proceedings of the 7thinternational conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM'1994), JamesC. French and Hans Hinterberger (Eds.), IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 1994,pp. 166-174. DOI 10.1109/SSDM.1994.336950.
  8. Brown, J., Demeranville, T. and Meadows, A. (2016) "Open Access in Context: Connecting Authors,Publications and Workflows Using ORCID Identifiers", Publications 4, Vol. 4, No. 4, ArticleNumber: 30. ISSN 2304-6775. DOI 10.3390/publications4040030.
  9. “Dublin Core : Czech“ (2006) [Online]. Available:[Accessed: 10 Jun. 2017].
  10. Heery, R. and Patel, M. (2000) “Application Profiles: Mixing and Matching MetadataSchemas,“ARIADNE, Vol. 25, John Wiley & Sons.
  11. Hodge, G., Templeton, C. and Allen, R. (2005) “A metadata element set for project documentation“,Science and Technology Libraries, Vol. 25, No.4, pp. 5-23. DOI 10.1300/J122v25n04_02. DOI 10.1300/J122v25n04_02.
  12. ISO 26324:2012 (2012) “Information and documentation - Digital object identifier system“. [Online].Available: [Accessed: 16 Jun. 2017].
  13. Jarolimek J. and Martinec, R. (2016) “Analysis of Open Data Availability in Czech RepublicAgrarian Sector", AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 57 - 67.ISSN 1804-1930. DOI 10.7160/aol.2016.080306.
  14. Masner, J., Vanek, J. and Jarolimek, J. (2016) "Prototype of a Content Creation and UpdatingApplication Module for Agrarian Sector and Regional Development", Scientific conference AgrarianPerspectives - Global and European Challenges for Food Production, Agribusiness and the RuralEconomy, Sep 14-16, 2016, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague. IS SN 2464-4781.
  15. Mitrovic, I. and Protic, J., (2014) "Problems with affiliations, names and personal identityin the proces of evaluating higher education institutions", 6th International Conference on Educationand New Learning Technologies", Jun 2014, Barcelona. ISSN 978-84-617-0557-3.
  16. Nature, (2009) “Credit where credit is due“, Nature, Vol. 462, No. 7275, pp. 825. [Online].Available: [Accessed: 13 Jun. 2017].ISSN 0028-0836. DOI 10.1038/462825a.
  17. Simek, P., Stoces, M., Vanek, J., Jarolimek, J., Masner, J. and Hrbek, I. (2013b) “Usingof Automatic Metadata Providing“, AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Vol. 5,No. 4, pp. 189-197. ISSN 1804-1930.
  18. Simek, P., Vanek, J., Jarolimek, J., Stoces, M. and Vogeltanzovw, T. (2013a) “Using metadataformats and AGROVOC thesaurus for data description in the agrarian sector“, Plant, Soiland Environment, Vol 59, No. 8, pp. 378-384. ISSN 1214-1178.
  19. Stoces, M., Masner, J. and Jarolimek, J. (2015) “Mitigation of Social Exclusion in Regionsand Rural Areas – E-learning with Focus on Content Creation and Evaluation“, AGRIS on-linePapers in Economics and Informatics, Vol 7, No. 4, pp. 143-150. ISSN 1804-1930.
  20. Svastova, P. (2009) “MODS a další metadatová schémata v oblasti digitalizace dokumentů“(in Czech), Knihovny současnosti 2009, Vol 17, pp. 127 - 132. ISBN 978-80-86249-54-4.
  21. Taheri, S. M. and Hariri, N., A. (2012) "A comparative study on the indexing and rankingof the content objects including the MARCXML and Dublin Core's metadata elementsby general search engines", The Electronic Library, Vol. 30, No: 4, pp. 480-491. DOI 10.1108/02640471211252193.
  22. Taylor, A. G., Joudrey, D. N. (2009) “The organization of information”, 3rd ed. Westport, Conn.:Libraries Unlimited, Vol. 16, pp. 512. ISBN 159158700x.
  23. Veron, S., Celeste, V., Alejandra, A. M., Milagros de los , G. M. (2016) "An interoperability modelbased on ontologies for learning object repositories", 2016 International Symposium on Computersin Education (SIIE), Salamanca, pp. 1-6. DOI 10.1109/SIIE.2016.7751843.

Full paper

  Full paper (.pdf, 931.59 KB).