Economic Valuation of Mountain Landscapes and Ecosystems: A Meta-Analysis of Case Studies

Zdeňka Žáková KroupováMichaela HavlíkováPavlína HálováMichal Malý

DOI 10.7160/aol.2016.080310
No 3/2016, September
pp. 103-112

Žáková Kroupová, Z., Havlíková, M., Hálová, P., M. Malý (2016) “Economic Valuation of Mountain Landscapes and Ecosystems: A Meta-Analysis of Case Studies", AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 103 - 112. ISSN 1804-1930. DOI 10.7160/aol.2016.080310.

Abstract

The paper is focused on the value of the European mountain landscape/ecosystem and evaluates the impact of agriculture and agricultural policy on the value of this public good. Based on the meta-analysis of 22 landscape/ecosystem valuation studies, it was found that the average value of the European mountain landscape/ecosystem is 3,068 EUR per hectare per year, and 3.91 EUR per person per day. However, there are regions with a significantly higher value – Tatra in Poland and Alpujarran in Spain. The value is influenced by the position of agriculture in the national economy. Higher values of the mountain landscape/ ecosystem were achieved in countries where the contribution of agriculture to the gross value added is above average. On the other hand, there is no significant relationship between the proportion of farming in the LFA and the value of the mountain landscape/ecosystem. Public support was found to be insufficient to cover the cost of landscape services performed by farmers.

Keywords

Mountain, landscape, ecosystem, value, agriculture, LFA, Europe, meta-analysis.

References

  1. Alvarez-Farizo, B., N. Hanley, R.E. Wright and D. Macmillan (1999) “Estimationg the Benefits of Agri-environmental Policy: Econometric Issue in Open-ended Contingent Valuation Studies”, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 23-43. ISSN 0964-0568. DOI 10.1080/09640569911280.
  2. Antoušková, M. (2012) “Economic value of recreation – Determinants influencing the willingness to pay in natural region with low-intensity agriculture”, Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 3 – 9. ISSN 1804-1930.
  3. Arriaza, M., J. F. Cañas-Ortega, et al. (2004) ”Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes”, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 69, pp. 115–125. ISSN 0169-2046. DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.029.
  4. Bastian, O., Ch. Stein, G. Lupp, J. Behrens, Ch. Renner, and K. Grunewal (2015) “The appreciation of nature and landscape by tourism service provides and visitors in the Ore Mountains (Germany)”, Landscape online, Vol. 41, pp. 1 – 23. ISSN 1865-1542. DOI 10.3097/LO.201541.
  5. Bernués, A., Rodriguez-Ortega, T., Ripoll-Bosh, R. and Alfnes, F. (2014) “Socio-cultural economic valuation of ecosystem services provided by Mediterranean mountain agroecosystem“, PLoS ONE, Vol. 9, No. 7, pp. e102479. ISSN 1932-6203. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0102479.
  6. Burrel, A. (2011) „Evaluating Policies for Delivering Agri-environmental Public Goods“, paper presented on OECD Workshop on the Evaluation of Agri-environmental Policies, Braunschweig, 20-22.6.2011.
  7. Campbell, D., Hutchinson, G. and Scarpa, R. (2005) “Using choice experiment to value farm landscape improvements: Implications of inconsistent preferences”, Applied Environmental Economics Conference. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237522629_ USING_CHOICE_EXPERIMENTS_TO_VALUE_FARM_LANDSCAPE_IMPROVEMENTS_ IMPLICATIONS_OF_INCONSISTENT_PREFERENCES. [Accessed: 15 Jun. 2016].
  8. Ciaian, P., Gomez y Paloma, S. (2011) „The Value of EU Agricultural Landscape“, Paper presented at the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association’s 2011 AAEA & NAREA Joint Annual Meeting, Pittsburg, Pensylvania, July 24-26, 2011. DOI 10.2791/60382.
  9. Füzyová, L., Lániková, D. and Novorlský, M. (2009) “Economic Valuation of Tatras National Park and Regional Environmental Policy”, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, Vol 18, No. 5, pp. 811 – 818. ISSN 1230-1485.
  10. Getzner M. (2000) “Hypothetical and real economic commitments, and social status in valuing a species protection program”, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 541 – 559. ISSN 1360-0559. DOI 10.1080/713676576.
  11. Getzner, M. (2010) “Ecosystem services, financing, and the regional economy: A case study from Tatra national Park, Poland”, Biodiversity, Vol. 11, No. 1-2, pp. 55 – 61. ISSN 2160-0651. DOI 10.1080/14888386.2010.9712648.
  12. Gios G., Goio I., Notaro S. and Raffaelli R. (2006) “The value of natural resources for tourism: A case study of the Italian Alps”, International Journal of Tourism Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 77 – 85. ISSN 1522-1970. DOI 10.1002/jtr.552.
  13. Glück P. and Kuen H. (1977) “Der Erholungswert des Grossen Ahornbodens” [in German]. Allgemeine Forstzeitung, Vol. 88, pp.7 – 11. ISSN 0002-5879.
  14. Goio I., Gios, G. and Pollini C. (2008) “The development of forest accounting in the province of Trento (Italy)”, Journal of Forest Economics, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 177 – 196. ISSN 1104-6899. DOI 10.1016/j.jfe.2007.09.002.
  15. Green, W. H. (2008) “Econometric Analysis”, Sixth edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education. 1178 p. ISBN 978-0-13-513740-6.
  16. Grêt-Regamey A, Bebi P, Bishop I. D, Schmid W. (2008) “Linking GIS-based models to value ecosystem services in an Alpine region”, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 89, No. 3, pp. 197-208. ISSN 0301-4797. DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.05.019.
  17. Häyhä, T., Franzese, P. P., Palleto, A. and Fath, B. D. (2015) “Assessing, valuing and mapping ecosystem services in Alpine forest”, Ecosystem Services, Vol. 14, pp. 12 – 23. ISSN 2212-0416. DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.03.001.
  18. Hackl, F. and Pruckner G. J. (1997) “Contingent Valuation als Instrument zur ökonomischen Bewertung der Landschaft [in German].” Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Lang. ISBN 978-3631305379.
  19. Knudsen D. C., Metro-Roland, M. M., Soper, A. K. and Greer Ch. E. (1995) “Landscape, tourism, and meaning”. Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Hampshire. ISBN 978-0-7546-49-3.
  20. Kubíčková, S. (2004) “Non-market evaluation of landscape function of agriculture in the PLA White Carpathians”, Agricultural Economics, Vol. 50, No. 9, pp. 399 – 393. ISSN 1805-9295.
  21. Lefebvre, M., Espiroza, M., Gomez y Poloma, S. (2012) “The influence of the Common Agricultural Policy on agricultural landscapes”, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2012. ISBN 978-92-79-25828-2.
  22. Löwenstein W. (1995) “Die monetäre Bewertung der Schutzfunktion des Waldes vor Lawinen und Rutschungen in Hinterstein (Allgäu) [in German]” , In: Bergen V, Löwenstein W, Pfister G. Studien zur monetären Bewertung von externen Effekten der Forst- und Holzwirtschaft. Schriften zur Forstökonomie 2. 2nd edition. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Sauerländer, pp 117–178.
  23. Lutting, J. (2000) “The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house price in Netherlands”, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 48, No. 3-4, pp. 161 – 167. ISSN 0169-2046. DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00039-6.
  24. Marangon, F. and F. Visintin (2007) “Rural landscape valuation in a cross-border region”, Cahiers d’économie et sociologie rurales, Vol. 84, pp. 113-132. ISSN 0755-9208.
  25. Melichar, J. (2007) “Economic valuation of forest quality change in Jizerské Hory mountains: The evidence from contingent behavior study”, Paper presented at the Ninth Annoual Bioecon Conference, Kings College Cambridge. [Online]. Available: http://www.bioecon-network.org/ pages/9th_2007/Melichar.pdf. [Accessed: 15 Jun. 2016].
  26. Molina, J. R., Silva, F. R. and Herrera, M. A. (2016) “Integrating economic landscape valuation into Mediterranean territorial planning”, Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 56, pp. 120 – 128. ISSN 1462-9011. DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.010.
  27. Moon, W. and W. Griffith (2010) „Assessing public preferences and holistic economic value for multifunctional agriculture in the U.S.“ Paper presented et 2010 Annual Meeting, Orlando, Florida. [Online]. Available: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/56010/2/Wanki_Moon_ manuscript_SouthernAgEconMeeting_Dec24_2009.pdf. [Accessed: 15 Jun. 2016].
  28. Notaro, S. and Paletto, A. (2011) “Links between Mountain Communities and Environmental Services in the Italian Alps”, Sociologia Ruralis, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 137 – 156. ISSN 1467-9523. DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00532.x.
  29. Palleto A., Geitner, C., Grilli, G., Hastik, R., Pastorella, F. and Rodrigez Garcia, L. (2015) “Mapping the value of ecosystem services: A case study from the Austrian Alps”, Annals of Forest Research, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 157 – 175. ISSN 1610-7403. DOI 10.15287/afr.2015.335.
  30. Považan, R., Getzner, M. and Švajda, J. (2014) “Value of ecosystem services in mountain national parks. Case study of Veľká Fatra National park (Slovakia)”, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, Vol 23, No. 5, pp. 1699 – 1710. ISSN 1230-1485.
  31. Rodriguez-Ortega, T., Bernués, A. and Alnes, F. (2016) “Psychographic profile affects willingness to pay for ecosystem services provided by Mediterranean high nature value farmland”, Ecological Economic, Vol. 128, pp. 232 – 245. ISSN 0921-8009. DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.05.002.
  32. Sayadi, S., González-Roa C. M. and Calatrava-Raquena, J. (2009) “Public preferences for landscape features: The case of agricultural landscape in mountainous Mediterranean areas”, Land Use Policy, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 334 – 344. ISSN 0264-8377. DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.04.003.
  33. Soliva, R. and Hunziker, M. (2009) “How do biodiversity and conservation values relates to landscape preferences? A case study from the Swiss Alps”, Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 18, No. 9, pp. 2483 – 2507. ISSN 1572-9710.
  34. Tagliafierro, C., Longo, A., Eetvelde, V., Antrop, M. and Hutchinson, W. G. (2013) “Landscape economic valuation by integrating landscape ecology into landscape economics”, Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 32, pp. 26 – 36. ISSN 1462-9011.
  35. Tempesta, T. and Thiene, M. (2004) “The willingness to pay for conservation of mountain landscape in Cortina d ́Ampezzo”, Proceeding of the 90th EAAE Seminar, Multifunctional Agriculture, Rennes, France. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237115492_The_ willingness_to_pay_for_the_conservation_of_mountain_landscape_in_Cortina_D'Ampezzo_Italy. [Accessed: 15 Jun. 2016].
  36. Thiam, A., Bravo-Ureta, B. E., Rivas, T. E. (2001) “Technical Efficiency in Developing Countries Agriculture: A Meta-Analysis”, Agricultural Economics, Vol. 25, pp. 235– 243. ISSN 1805-9295. DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00204.x.
  37. Van Huylenbroeck, G., Vanslembrouck, I., Calus, M and Van De Vaide, L. (2006) “The influence of planned-change context on the evaluation of natural landscape”, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 43, No. 1-3, pp. 14 – 21. ISSN 0169-2046.
  38. Welch, B. L. (1947) “The generalization of "Student's" problem when several different population variances are involved”, Biometrika, Vol. 34, No. 1–2, pp. 28 – 35. ISSN 1464-3510.

Full paper

  Full paper (.pdf, 291.95 KB).