Do Digital Public Services Matter? A Comparative Study of the Czech Republic and the Republic of Kazakhstan

Miloš UlmanN. S. UaliyevMeruyert Toregozhina

DOI 10.7160/aol.2016.080210
No 2/2016, June
pp. 121-133

Ulman, M., Ualiyev, N. S. and Toregozhina, M. B. (2016) “Do Digital Public Services Matter? A Comparative Study of the Czech Republic and the Republic of Kazakhstan", AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 121-133. ISSN 1804-1930. DOI 10.7160/aol.2016.080210.

Abstract

Provision of quality public services has been in great concern of many governments for longer period of time. An interesting fact could be observed that, as to the demand and supply of digital public services, some developed European countries could lag behind some upper-middle-income countries. The paper explores differences in digital public services provision (supply side) and use (demand side) between the Czech Republic and Kazakhstan. A document analysis was done and a comparative study based on secondary data was elaborated. We can confirm that even a country from outside of the EU (Kazakhstan) can provide a better organized supply of digital services than an EU member state (Czech Republic) at least on the national level. According to the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) benchmarking, there are also significant discrepancies among national, regional and local services in the EU. The same phenomenon is also reported from transitional countries like Kazakhstan.

Keywords

Digital public services, electronic public services, rural development, e-government, European Union, DESI, EGDI, Czech Republic, Kazakhstan.

References

  1. Al-Hujran, O., Migdadi, M., Al-Debei, M. M., and Chatfield, A. (2015) "The imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-government adoption and use", Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 53, pp. 189-203. ISSN 07475632. DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.025.
  2. Ardielli, E. and Halásková, M. (2015) "Assessment of E-government in EU Countries", Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Vol. 22, No. 34, pp. 4-16. ISSN 1211555X.
  3. Arendsen, R., Peters, O., ter Hedde, M. and van Dijk, J. (2014) "Does e-government reduce the administrative burden of businesses? An assessment of business-to-government systems usage in the Netherlands", Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 160-169. ISSN 0740-624X. DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2013.09.002.
  4. Bhuiyan, S. H. (2010) "E-Government in Kazakhstan: Challenges and its role to development", Public Organization Review, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 31-47. ISSN 15667170. DOI: 10.1007/s11115-009-0087-6. DOI 10.1007/s11115-009-0087-6.
  5. Burden, K. (2016) "EU update", Computer Law and Security Review: The International Journal of Technology Law and Practice, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 540-545. ISSN 0267-3649. DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2016.04.001. DOI 10.1016/j.clsr.2016.04.001.
  6. CIA. (2016) "The World Factbook 2016-17". Central Intelligence Agency. [Online]. Available: Washington, DC: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html [Accessed: 20 December, 2015].
  7. Czech Statistical Office (2013) “Municipalities of the Czech Republic, 2013”. Czech Statistical Office. [Online]. Available:https://www.czso.cz/documents/10180/20556813/3202041403.pdf/02461179- 0469-419a-935a-e1b3452884e4?version=1.0 [Accessed: 20 December, 2015].
  8. EC. (2010) "European Interoperability Framework (EIF) for European public services. Annex 2 to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions 'Towards interoperability for European public services", European Commission. [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/isa/ documents/isa_annex_ii_eif_en.pdf [Accessed: 20 December, 2015].
  9. EC. (2014) "Delivering on the European Advantage? How European Governments can and should benefit from innovative public services"", European Commission. [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/eu-egovernment-report-2014-shows-usability- online-public-services-improving-not-fast [Accessed: 20 December, 2015].
  10. EC. (2015) “Digital Agenda Scoreboard 2015”, European Commission. [Online] Available: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/digital-agenda-scoreboard-2015-most-targets- reached-time-has-come-lift-digital-borders. [Accessed: 20 December, 2015].
  11. EC. (2016a) "DESI 2016 Digital Economy and Society Index. Methodological note", European Commission. [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/desi [Accessed: 15 December, 2015].
  12. EC. (2016b) “Europe's Digital Progress Report (EDPR) 2016. Czech Republic". European Commission. [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/download- scoreboard-reports [Accessed: 15 December, 2015].
  13. EIU. (2013) "E-government in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Expert views on the UN e-government survey". Economist Intelligence Unit. [Online]. Available: workspace.unpan.org/ sites/Internet/.../Expert_views_egov_surveyEMEA_EIU.pdf [Accessed: 20 December, 2015].
  14. EIU. (2013) "E-government in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Expert views on the UN e-government survey". Economist Intelligence Unit. [Online]. Available: workspace.unpan.org/ sites/Internet/.../Expert_views_egov_surveyEMEA_EIU.pdf [Accessed: 20 December, 2015].
  15. Fan, J. and Yang, W. (2015) "Study on E-Government services quality: The integration of online and offline services", Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, Vol. 8, No.3, pp. 693-718. ISSN 20130953. DOI 10.3926/jiem.1405.
  16. Gilbert, E., Karahalios, K. and Sandvig, C. (2010) “The network in the garden: Designing social media for rural life”, American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 53, No. 9, pp. 1367-1388. ISSN 00027642. DOI 10.1177/0002764210361690.
  17. Government for Citizens (2016) “Citizen Service Center” [Online]. Available: http://www.con.gov. kz/ [Accessed: 15 December, 2015].
  18. IMF. (2015) "World Economic Outlook Database". International Monetary Fund. [Online]. Available: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/02/weodata/index.aspx [Accessed: 15 December, 2015].
  19. Interfax. (2015) "Kazakhstan E-gov provides services to 3.5 million registered users", Kazakhstan General Newswire.
  20. ITU. (2015) "Measuring the information society report", International Telecommunication Union Geneva. ISBN 978-92-61-15791-3.
  21. Janenova, S. (2010) "E-Government in Kazakhstan: Challenges for a transitional country", Paper presented at the 18th NISPAcee Annual Conference "Public Administration in Times of Crisis" in Warsaw, Poland.
  22. Janenova, S. and Kim, P. S. (2016) "Innovating Public Service Delivery in Transitional Countries: The Case of One Stop Shops in Kazakhstan", International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 323-333. ISSN 01900692. DOI 10.1080/01900692.2015.1064445.
  23. Jones, S., Irani, Z. and Sharif, A. (2007) "E-government evaluation: Reflections on three organisational case studies", 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2007, HICSS'07. ISSN 15301605. DOI 10.1109/HICSS.2007.189.
  24. Khalil Moghaddam, B. and Khatoon-Abadi, A. (2013) “Factors affecting ICT adoption among rural users: A case study of ICT Center in Iran”, Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 37, No. 11, pp. 1083-1094. ISSN 0308596. DOI 10.1016/j.telpol.2013.02.005.
  25. Kirkman, G. S., Cornelius, P. K., Sachs, J. D., Schwab, K. and World Economic, F. (2002) "Global information technology report 2001 - 2002: readiness for the networked world", New York. ISBN 0195152581.
  26. Kunstelj, M. and Vintar, M. (2004) “Evaluating the progress of e-government development: A critical analysis”, Information Polity: The International Journal of Government and Democracy in the Information Age, Vol. 9, No. 3-4, pp. 131-148. ISSN 15701255.
  27. Lijuan, H., Chunfang, Z., Wenjun, Y. and Qiaoqiao, L. (2014) Evolutionary analysis of e-government platform based on the integration of urban and rural areas. EEA - Electrotehnica, Electronica, Automatica, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 143-153. ISSN 15825175.
  28. Limba, T. and Gulevičiūtė, G. (2013) "Pecularities of Electronic Public Services Implementation in European Union and Lithuania", Social Technologies / Socialines Technologijos, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 372-389. ISSN 2029-7564.
  29. Lindgren, I. and Jansson, G. (2013) "Electronic services in the public sector: A conceptual framework", Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 163-172. ISSN 0740-624X. DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2012.10.005.
  30. Mateus, A. (2016) "DESI / I-DESI Digital Economy and Society Index" [Online]. Available: http://unctad.org/meetings/en/Presentation/dtl_eweek2016_AMateus_en.pdf [Accessed: 15 December, 2015]
  31. Máchová, R. (2015) “An Analytical Hierarchy Process Model For The Evaluation of the E-government Development”, Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Vol. 22, No. 34, pp. 88-100. ISSN 1211555X.
  32. Miah, S. J. (2012) “The role of end user in e-government application development: A conceptual model in the agricultural context”, Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 69-85. ISSN 15462234. DOI 10.4018/joeuc.2012070104.
  33. MOIA (2016) “Czech Point, 2016”. Ministry of Interior Affairs. [Online]. Available: http://www.czechpoint.cz/web/?q=node/488 aspx [Accessed: 15 December, 2015].
  34. Nayak, S. K., Thorat, S. B. and Kalyankar, N. V. (2010) “Reaching the Unreached A Role of ICT in Sustainable Rural Development”, International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, IJCSIS, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 220-224. ISSN 19475500.
  35. Ntaliani, M., Costopoulou, C., Karetsos, S. and Molhanec, M. (2015) Citizen e-Empowerment in Greek and Czech municipalities. 6th International Conference on e-Democracy, e-Democracy 2015; Athens; Greece; 10 December 2015. Vol. 570. ISBN 978-331927163-7. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-27164-4_9.
  36. OECD. (2014) "OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2014". Organisation for EconomicCo-operation and Development. ISBN 978-92-64-22228-1. DOI 10.1787/139a90c6-en.
  37. Reddick, C. G. and Roy, J. (2013) "Business perceptions and satisfaction with e-government: Findings from a Canadian survey", Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 1-9. ISSN 0740-624X. DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.009.
  38. Rorissa, A., Demissie, D. and Pardo, T. (2011) "Benchmarking e-Government: A comparison of frameworks for computing e-Government index and ranking", Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 354-362. ISSN: 0740-624X. DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2010.09.006.
  39. Sheryazdanova, G. R., Abdina, A. K., Abdildina, H. S., Kakimzhanova, M. K., Sadykova, T. M., and Gappasova, A. G. (2016) "Development of electronic government in Kazakhstan as a tool to combat corruption", Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 1-7. ISSN 09745645. DOI 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i5/87617.
  40. Skersys, T., Butleris, R., Nemuraite, L., Suomi, R., Boer, Y. v. d., Pieterson, W. and Arendsen, R. (2011) "Channel choice in the G2B context: towards a research agenda" 11th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society, I3E 2011, October 12-14, 2011, Kaunas, Lithuania, pp. 14-27.
  41. Sorrentino, M., De Marco, M. and Depaoli, P. (2015) "Steering the digital agenda at arm’s length. All wobble, no spin: The contextual lens", Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9248, pp. 31-43. ISBN 9783319224787. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-22479-4_3.
  42. Sá, F., Rocha, Á. and Pérez Cota, M. (2015) "From the quality of traditional services to the quality of local e-Government online services: A literature review", Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 1. ISSN 0740-624X. DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.004.
  43. Tan, C. W., Benbasat, I. and Cenfetelli, R. T. (2013) "IT-Mediated Customer Service Content and Delivery in Electronic Governments: An Empirical Investigation of the Antecedents of Service Quality". MIS Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 77-109. ISSN 02767783. DOI 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.04.
  44. Townsend, L., Fairhurst, G., Wallace, C. and Sathiaseelan, A. (2013) “Enhanced broadband access as a solution to the social and economic problems of the rural digital divide”, Local Economy, Vol. 28, No. 6, pp. 580-595. ISSN 02690942. DOI 10.1177/0269094213496974.
  45. Transparency International. (2015) "Corruption Perceptions Index 2015" [Online]. Available: http://www.transparency.org/cpi2015 [Accessed: 25 December 2015].
  46. UN. (2014) "UN E-Government Survey 2014. E-Government for the Future We Want", United Nations, New York. ISBN 978-92-1-123198-4.
  47. Vanek, J., Cervenkova, E., Jarolimek, J. and Simek, P. (2010) "State and evaluation of information and communication technologies development in agricultural enterprises in the Czech Republic", Plant Soil and Environment, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 144-147. ISSN 12141178. DOI 10.17221/212/2009-PSE.
  48. World Bank. (2016a) "Country and Lending Groups". The World Bank. [Online]. Available: http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-and-lending-groups - Upper_middle_income [Accessed: 12 January 2016].
  49. WEF. (2015) "The global Information technology report 2015: ICTs for inclusive growth". World Economic Forum, Geneva. ISBN 978-92-95044-48-7.
  50. World Bank. (2016b) "Doing Business 2016", The World Bank. ISBN 978-1-4648-0668-1. DOI 10.1596/978-1-4648-0667-4.
  51. Xia, J. (2010) “Linking ICTs to rural development: China's rural information policy”, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 187-195. ISSN 0740624X. DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2009.10.005.

Full paper

  Full paper (.pdf, 1.78 MB).