Agri-Environmental Performance of EU Member states

No 4/2015, December
pp. 199-208

Turčeková, N., Svetlanská, T., Kollár and B. Záhorský, T. (2015) “Agri-environmental Performance of EU member states”, AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 199 - 208, ISSN 1804-1930.


Agriculture as the primary sector has gained increased attention in terms of its environmental implications. Based on the reform of Common Agricultural Policy, there is a link of direct payments to requirements that farmers maintain land in good agricultural and environmental condition and obey the relevant environment legislation since 2003. The aim of our work is the evaluation of agri-environmental performance of 27 European Union member states (we do not consider Croatia as it is the newest member state and there are missing data). We employ data envelopment analysis to calculate environmental efficiency, and Malmquist index for quantification of productivity change with respect of environmental performance. The results show that in terms of agri-environmental efficiency scores Hungary, Malta, Luxembourg and Netherland are the only efficient countries over the whole observed period (2008-2012). The average output-oriented environmental efficiency is found to be 2.4 over the five observed years. The resulting productivity change is an average decrease of TFP (9%) over the period 2008-2012.JEL: Q01, Q53, Q57, C38


Agri-environmental performance, DEA, efficiency, desirable output, undesirable output.


  1. Boyd, G. A., Pang, J. X. Estimating the linkage between nnergy efficiency and productivity .Energy Policy. 2000, Vol. 28, No. 5, p. 289-296. ISSN 0301-4215. DOI 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00016-1.
  2. Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., Diewert, W. E. Multilateral comparisons of output, input and productivity using superlative index numbers. The Economic Journal. 1982, Vol. 92, No. 365, p. 73-86. ISSN 1468-0297. DOI 10.2307/2232257.
  3. Coelli, T. J., Lauwers, L.,Van Huylenbroeck, G. Environmental Efficiency Measurement and the Materials Balance Condition. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 2007, Vol. 28, No. 1, p.3-12. ISSN 1573-0441. DOI 10.1007/s11123-007-0052-8.
  4. Diaz-Balteiro, L., Romero, C. In search of a natural systems sustainability index. Ecological Economics. 2004, Vol. 49, No. 3, p. 401-405. ISSN 0921-8009. DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.005.
  5. Domanska, K., Kijek, T., Nowak, A. Agricultural Total Factor Productivity Change and its Determinants in European Union Countries. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2014. Vol. 20, No.6, p. 273-1280. ISSN1273-1280.
  6. Dyckhoff, H., Allen, K. Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA). European Journal of Operational Research. 2001, Vol. 132, No. 3, p. 312-325. ISSN 0377-2217. DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00154-5.
  7. Emerson, J. W., Hsu, A., Levy, M. A., De Sherbinin, A., Mara, V., Esty, D.C., Jaiteh, M. 2012 Environmental Performance Index and Pilot Trend Environmental Performance Index. New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy. 2012 [Online] Available: [Accessed: 15 March 2015].
  8. Esty, D. C., Levy, M. A., Srebotnja, T., De Sherbinin, A., Kim,B., Anderson, B. Pilot Environmental Performance Index. Yale Centre for Environmental Law & Policy, NewHaven. 2006 [Online]. Available: [Accessed: 15 March 2015].
  9. European Comission. General Union Environment Action Programme to 2020. 2012/0337 (COD). 2014.A7-0166/2013, [Online] Available: [Accessed: 20 April 2015].
  10. Eurostat (2015a). Output of the agricultural industry - basic and producer prices (tag00102). [Online] Available: do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tag00102&plugin=1. (Last data update 18. 11. 2015) [Accessed: 20 November 2015].
  11. Eurostat (2015b). HICP (2005 = 100) - annual data (average index and rate of change) (prc_hicp_aind). [Online] Available: (Last data update 16. 11. 2015) [Accessed: 20 November 2015].
  12. Eurostat (2015c). Purchasing power parities (PPPs), price level indices and real expenditure sfor ESA2010 aggregates (prc_ppp_ind). [Online] Available: . (Last data update 18. 9. 2015) [Accessed: 10 October 2015].
  13. Eurostat (2015d). Greenhouse gas emissions by sector (source: EEA) (tsdcc210). [оnline] Available: . (Last data update 02. 07. 2015) [Accessed: 10 October 2015].
  14. Eurostat (2015e). Arable crops: number of farms and areas of different arable crops by economic size of farm (SO in Euro) and size of arable area (ef_alarableecs). [Online] Available: (Last data update 18. 11. 2015) [Accessed: 20 November 2015].
  15. Eurostat (2015f). Agricultural Labour Input Statistics: absolute figures (1 000 annual work units) (aact_ali01). [On-line] Available: . (Last data update 18. 11. 2015) [Accessed: 20 November 2015].
  16. Eurostat (2015g). Consumption estimate of manufactured fertilizers (source: Fertilizers Europe) (aei_fm_manfert). [Online] Available: (Last data update 17. 12. 2014) [Accessed: 15 March 2015].
  17. Eurostat (2015h). Economic accounts for agriculture – values at current prices (aact_eaa01). [Online] Available: (Last data update 18. 11. 2015) [Accessed: 20 November 2015].
  18. Harris, R., Trainor M. Capital subsidies and their impact on total factor productivity: Firm-level evidence from Northern Ireland. Journal of Regional Science . 2005. Vol. 45, No.1, p.49-74. ISSN: 1467-9787. DOI 10.1111/j.0022-4146.2005.00364.x.
  19. Hassan, F. M., Salman, J. M. Alkam, F. A., Jawad, H. Ecological Observations on Epipelic Algae in Euphrates River at Hindiya and Manathira, Iraq. International Journal of Advanced Research. 2014, Vol. 2, No. 4, p. 1183-1194, ISSN 2320 - 5407.
  20. Hoang, V. N. Measuring and decomposing changes in agricultural productivity, nitrogen use efficiency and cumulative exergy efficiency: Application to OECD agriculture. Ecological Modelling. 2010. Vol. 222, No. 1, p. 164-175. ISSN 0304-3800. DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.09.032.
  21. Hoang, V. N., Rao, P. Measuring and decomposing sustainable efficiency in agricultural production: A cumulative exergy balance approach. Ecological Economics. 2010. Vol. 69, No. 9, p. 1765–1776. ISSN 0921-8009. DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.014.
  22. Jordan, A. J., Adelle, C. Environmental Policy in the European Union: Contexts, Actors and Policy Dynamics (3ed). Earthscan: London and Sterling. 2012, [Online] Available: [Accessed: 15 March 2015].
  23. Korhonen, P. J., Luptacik, M. Eco-efficiency analysis ofpower plants: An extension of data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research. 2004, Vol. 154, No. 2, p. 437-446. ISSN 0377-2217. DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00180-2.
  24. Mawson, P. Productivity measurement: Alternative approaches and estimates. New Zealand Treasury Working Paper. 2003. Working paper 03/12, p. 9-10. Treasury:494653v4.
  25. Olsthooml, X., Tyteca, D., Wehrmeyer, W., Wagner, M. Environmental indicators for business: A review of the literature and standardisation methods. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2001, Vol. 9, No. 5, p. 453-463. ISSN 0959-6526. DOI 10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00005-1.
  26. Ramanathan, R. A holistic approach to compare energy efficiencies of different transport models. Energy Policy. 2000, Vol. 28, No. 11, p.743-747. ISSN 0301-4215. DOI 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00072-0.
  27. Scheel, H. Undesirable outputs inefficiency valuations, European Journal of Operational Research. 2001, Vol. 132, No. 2, p. 400-410. ISSN 0377-2217. DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00160-0.
  28. Swift, M. J., Izac, A.-M. N., Van Noordwijk, M. Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes - are we asking the right questions. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2004, Vol. 104, No.1, p.113-134. DOI: doi:10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.013. ISSN: 0167-8809. DOI
  29. Hřebíček, J., Valtinyová, S., Křen, J. Hodinka, M., Trenz, O., Marada. P. Sustainability Indicators: Development and Application for the Agriculture Sector. In Marina G Erechtchoukova, Peter A Khaiter, Paulina Golinska. Sustainability Appraisal: Quantitative Methods and Mathematical Techniques for Environmental Performance Evaluation. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2013. p. 63-102, 40 p., EcoProduction. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32081-1. ISBN 978-3-642-32080-4.
  30. Turčeková N., Svetlanská T., Adamičková I. Efficiency Of Biomass Production - Methodological Approaches. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development. 2015, Vol. 4, No. 1, p. 2-6. DOI: 10.1515/vjbsd-2015-0001. ISSN 1339-3367. DOI
  31. Svetlanská, T., Záhorský, T. Technical efficiency and productivity of agriculture in EU member states. In Scientia Iuventa 2015. Banská Bystrica: Belianum, 2015, p. 553-561. ISBN 978-80-557-0858-4.
  32. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Data envelopment analysis for environmental assessment: comparison between public and priváte ownership in petroleum industry. 2012. European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 216, No. 3, p. 668-678. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.046. ISSN: 0377-2217. DOI
  33. Tryon, R. C. Cluster Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: EdwardsBrothers. 1939.
  34. Tyteca, D. On the measurement of the environmental performance of firms - a literature review and a productive efficiency perspective. Journal of Environmental Management. 1996, Vol. 46, No. 3, p. 281-308. ISSN 0301-4797. DOI
  35. Uthes, S., Matzdorf, B. Studies on Agri-environmental Measures: A Survey of the Literature. Environmental Management. 2013, Vol. 51, No. 1, p. 251-266. ISSN 1432-1009. DOI 10.1007/s00267-012-9959-6.
  36. Vlontzos, G., Nyavis S., Manos, B. A DEA approach for estimating the agricultural energy and environmental efficiency of EU countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014. Vol. 40., p. 91-96. ISSN 1364-0321. DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.153.
  37. Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., Poh, K. L. Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance. Ecological Economics. 2006, Vol. 60, No. 1, p. 111-118. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.001. ISSN 0921-8009. DOI

Full paper

  Full paper (.pdf, 373.45 KB).