Several Comments on Creation and Use of PSE Indicator within Measuring of Financial Transfers to Agricultural Producers

No 1/2015, March
pp. 21-31

Boháčková I. (2015) "Several Comments on Creation and Use of PSE Indicator within Measuring of Financial Transfers to Agricultural Producers", AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 21 – 31. ISSN 1804-1930


The paper deals with problems of a PSE indicator. The aim is to delimit the EU position in the framework of selected OECD countries (countries of a comparable economic level). In this connection not only development tendency of this indicator is evaluated, but above all the attention is paid to the PSE structure. Further, the paper analyzes problems of the PSE in relation to incomes of agricultural producers and a profit of agricultural farms because the connection between these categories is considered significant. The methodology corresponds with set aims (a horizontal and vertical analysis, a comparison). Conclusions are presented in the sense: evaluation of development trends of the PSE, the PSE structure, suitability of the methodology of determination of indicators, analyses of the relation of the PSE, incomes and a profit.


Agriculture, financial transfers, estimation of production supports, incomes and profit of agricultural farms, European Union.


  1. Banders, S. M., Harsche, J., Salhofer, K., Teuber, R. The interregional and intertemporal allocation of EU producer Support: Magnitude and determinants, Review of regional research, Springer Berlin. 2007, vol. 27, p. 171-193. ISBN 0173-7600. DOI
  2. Anderson, K., Martin., W. Agriculture, Trade and the Doha Agenda in Agricultural Trade reform and the Doha Development Agenda, Washington and the World Bank, 2006. [Online] Available: [Accessed: 28.11.2013].
  3. Bielik, P., Juríček, P., Kunová, D. The comparison of agricultural support policies in the OECD and the EU countries from the perspective of economic globalization process. Agricultural Economics - Czech, ÚZEI Prague. 2007, 53, p. 339-348, ISSN 0139 -570X. DOI
  4. Butault, J. Evolution of agricultural support in real terms in OECD countries and emerging economies, 1971. [Online] Available: http://www.oecd-library.prg/agriculture…food/oecd_foof_agriculture_and_fisheries_working paper 37, 18156797 [Accessed: 20.2.2014].
  5. Corden, W. M. The Theory of Protection. Journal of Political Economy. The University of Chicago Press. 1973, vol. 81, No. 2, p. 504-506. ISSN: 0022-3808; E-ISS N: 1537-534X. DOI
  6. Corden, W. M. Effective Protection Revisited”, in Corden, W.M. Protection, Growth and Trade: Essays in International Economics. Oxford, 1985. [Online] Available: [Accessed: 2.2.2014]. DOI
  7. Effland, A. Classifying and Measuring Agricultural Support- Identifying Differences Between the WTO and OECD Systems, Economic Informatic Bulletin, Economics Researck Service/USDA, 2011, No.74 [Online] Available: [Accessed: 15.12.2013].
  8. Eurostat. [Online] Available: [Accessed: 14.7.2014].
  9. Färber, G., Seidel, B. Subventionsabbau: Fürhrt eine andere Subventionspolitik endlich zum Erfolg? 1nd edition, Waxmann, 2002. ISBN-13:9783830911302.
  10. Hansen, H., Harsche, J. Die Förderung landwirtschaftlicher Erzeugnisse durch die Europäische Agrarpolitik: Regionale Auswirkungen in Deutschland und Bestimmungsgrunde.Institut für Agrarpolitik, Giesen. 2005. [Online] Available: [Accessed: 3.11.2013].
  11. Hennig, C., Kraus, K. C., Struve, C. 2003. Institutionelle Grundlagen der Agrarprotektion: Eine polit-ökonomische Analyse der Agrarpolitik in den Mittle und Osteuropäische Ländern. Journalof Agricultural Economics, Dfv Madiengruppe, Frankfurt. 2003, No. 52, p. 6. ISSN 2191-4028.
  12. Joslin. T. E. International trade policy: the WTO Agenda for agriculture, Centre for Applied Economics and Policy Studies, Agricultural policy discussion paper No 14, Massé University. 1998, [Online] Available: [Accessed: 14.4.2014].
  13. Keyzer, M. The PSE once more, Vrije-Universiteit Amsterodam. 2002. [Online] Available: more.pdf. [Accessed: 8.9.2013].
  14. Legg, W. Agricultural Subsidies: Measurement and Use in Policy Evaluation, The Agricultural Economics Society, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2003, vol. 54, No. 2. [Online] Available: http://onlinelibrary,wiley.conm/journal/10.1111(ISSN)1477-9552 [Accessed: 8.10.2013]. DOI
  15. OECD. Monitoring and evaluation: Reference Tables, STATExtracts-Complete databases, 2013.[Online] Available:, 2013. [Accessed: 10.5.2014].
  16. Wilhelm, V. Daňové úlevy jako součást podpor pro zemědělství, in INPROFORUM Ekonomická krize - výzva pro regiony, České Budějovice. 2009, p. 404-409. ISBN 978-80-7394-173-4.
  17. Tangermann, S. Is the Concept of the PSE in Need of Revision? OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers No. 1, OECD, Paris, 2005. [Online] Available: [Accessed: 28.1.2014].
  18. Tangermann, S. Fading support: he truth blind the numbers, OECD Observer, Paris. 2004, No. 243.[Online] Available: http://www. [Accessed: 28.1.2014].
  19. Tangermann, S. Response to the article on „How useful is the PSE in determining agricultural support? Food Policy, economics planning and policy of food and agriculture, Elsevier, Amsterdam. 2006, vol. 31. ISBN 0306-9192. DOI
  20. Trdlicová, K. 2010. Zemědělská politika a podpory v zemědělství v zemích OECD, Bulletin ÚZEI, ÚZEI Prague. 2010, No. 11. p.15 - 23.

Full paper

  Full paper (.pdf, 358.69 KB).